office, business, accountant @ Pixabay

What if the firm’s marginal cost curve shifts as technology improves? What if as technology improves, firms become more productive at extracting more value from their resources, and as that productivity increases, so does their marginal cost curve? I believe that the answer to this question is the same as the answer to the question of when technology improves the firm’s marginal cost curve.

If technology increases productivity but firms marginal cost curve shifts, there’s a good chance that firms will become more productive at extracting more value from their resources, and therefore the firm’s marginal cost curve will shift. This is because the marginal cost curve only shifts upwards, but the firm’s marginal cost curve only shifts downwards.

Sure, it’s possible that the marginal cost curve only shifts downwards. But it’s also possible that the marginal cost curve just shifts horizontally. In that case, the firm that will gain the most from technology is the firm that is the largest exporter. If the marginal cost curve shifts horizontally, then the firm that gains more from technology is the firm that is the largest exporter.

In any case, the marginal cost curve can also shift vertically. This happens when the profit curve shifts upwards instead of downwards and this is where our firm, the one that just gained from technology, comes into play. The marginal cost curve shifts upwards because the firm that gains more from technology is the largest exporter. The firm that gains more from technology is the firm that is the largest exporter.

If that’s the case, then the size of the firm that gained more from technology is the firm that is the largest exporter. So the marginal cost curve shifts upwards. This happens because the firm that gains more from technology is the larger firm. The firm that gains more from technology is the largest firm.

You’ll recall (as I did) that the marginal cost (M/E) curve is an example of a U-shaped cost curve. We could also say the firm that gains more from technology is the largest firm. This isn’t as bad because the M/E curve only shifts downwards by one more position. However, it’s still a pretty bad idea to think that the biggest firm is the one that gains the most from technology.

I don’t think this is as bad as it sounds. For starters, there’s a lot more information in the ME curve. For example, there are firms that gain more from technology that are also larger firms. Secondly, its a natural thing for the marginal cost curve to shift downwards. It might not be the biggest firm, but it will gain more. In fact, I’ve seen this happen in many cases.

But the problem is that the firm whose marginal cost curve is lower has a greater chance of growing faster than the firm whose marginal cost curve is higher. For example, the largest firm in Texas will probably grow faster than any smaller firm in the state.

This is true in an abstract way. The firm with a lower marginal cost curve might be able to grow faster than the firm with a higher one. But the problem is that this higher-curvature firm is also more likely to have a monopoly position in the market place.

The firm with a lower marginal cost curve is also more likely to be a monopoly. That is, it has a monopoly position on a market. The problem is that monopolies are difficult to get out of, so a lot of firms are willing to pay a relatively low total cost of capital to stay in the game. This is true in an abstract way.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here